• Welcome to the Zelda Sages Forums!

    The Zelda Sages Community Forums are a fun and easy way to interact with Zelda fans from around the globe. Our members also have access to exclusive members' only content. Register and/or log in now! Please note that user registration is currently disabled. If you would like to register please contact us.

The Official Zeldasages Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The American Political Madrun

But "thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's ox" is also a commandment, but it is a pretty sweet ox...

But, no, I think the whole "seperation of church and state" thing is kinda odd. I mean, the only thing that the founding fathers said was " the shall be no national religion", not "church and state shall never, ever cross". If that were the case, then them making polygamy illegal is unconstitutional.

In other words, how it is now is fine. Teaching religion from a historical point of view, and having "In God we Trust" type of things is okay in my book.
 
Re: The American Political Madrun

But "thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's ox" is also a commandment, but it is a pretty sweet ox...

But, no, I think the whole "seperation of church and state" thing is kinda odd. I mean, the only thing that the founding fathers said was " the shall be no national religion", not "church and state shall never, ever cross". If that were the case, then them making polygamy illegal is unconstitutional.

In other words, how it is now is fine. Teaching religion from a historical point of view, and having "In God we Trust" type of things is okay in my book.
Yeah, not all the ten commandments but you get the idea.

The way it is now is fine. All the constitution says about the topic is:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .

Exactly. It should be taught in a historical point of view.
 
Re: The American Political Madrun

Evolution should be taught because it's not a religion at all, it's science.

Creationism, or the "other side of the argument", is completely religion.

There are many forms of religion, and unless they can teach them all equally, like science, they just should keep off the topic.

Every religion is historically significant, why is it that we learn more about Catholicism and Christanity than the other religions? They're not the ones with the most history, many other religions have the same or even more history than Catholicism and Christianity.

Unless they can find a way to teach everything equally, no religion should be taught in school.
 
Re: The American Political Madrun

They only teach the big players of history. Trust me, last year in my history class wee learned about a whole bunch of religions. In fact the book only mentioned christianity when talking about the later parts of Rome and when talking about the crusades. And on top of that any page you opened to mentioned the Islamic/muslim faith. So it's not all just Christianity being taught (at least not at my school, and we're a mainly white, Christian school (but it's a public school)).

I don't see how they can teach every single religion equally, considering there's a bunch of them out there. Just like they can't teach every single science or math or writer equally. It just can't be done, but they should at least try thier best to teach something, or else we'll just have a whole bunch of uneducated yokels running around.
 
Re: The American Political Madrun

Separation of church and state... GOD SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN OUT OF THE PLEDGE.
Separation of church and state... GOD SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE PLEDGE. The Pledge of Allegiance was already commonly recited in schools when in 1954 somebody in Congress apparently decided that apparently someone might mistake America for being communist (read: Stalinist). So, in a move of unbridled idiocy, they decided that the best way to make America less communist was to add two words to the Pledge. Guess which ones.
 
Unless they can find a way to teach everything equally, no religion should be taught in school.


Every major religion should be taught in schools with a teacher that has absolutely no biases on any of them. (good look finding one >_>)
I agree with that

The world would be and would have been alot better off if religions had been taught to everyone with access to a good education. I absolutely can not stand religious intolerance and hypocrisy.
 
Well, I asked some members of the Something Awful forums about their views on health care:

Mug (somethingawful) said:
Is it true that in the USA, you have to pay for your medical care? Like, if you fall down and break your arm, you have to pay to get it fixed? I always hear this crap about "AMERICAN HEALTHCARE SUCKS" but no one ever explains why. The only thing I've ever heard is that you have to pay for hospital and doctor visits, which always surprised me when (some) other countries seem to handle the subject fairly well.

NihilismNow (somethingawful) said:
We have a socialized system with some degree of market forces. Basically the kind of system Massachusetes and California are considering.
Everybody is required to buy health insurance and health insurers are required to accept everyone. This has the advantages of a socialised system (nobody is uninsured) and some of the advantages of a market driven system. Health insurers don't want to pay a lot of money so they will pay for preventetive measures like a Gym membership for fat people or supplements and cholestorol lowering food for people with high cholesterol.

Klytus (somethingawful) said:
I've been in hospital in Australia a few times and in New Zealand once, both countries with socialized health care. A month ago I was in hospital in the United States for a badly broken leg. I'd had a bad fall which resulted in a double compound fracture, my tibia and fibula both shattered leaving my left foot hanging loose like you've probably seen in various nasty youtube videos. This hurts about as much as you'd expect, ie beyond anything I could have imagined.

2229661901_d687661cd1.jpg


I took this in the ER, you can see the angle of my foot to the angle of my knee. So, so, so much fun. I was shocked at the differences between the two systems, and my stay in that US hospital was one of the worst experiences of my life.

Ambulances:

In Australia, my father owns a farm about an hour north of Sydney. Two days ago he was up a ladder trimming branches with a chainsaw. He slipped and fell about 2 meters onto hard earth dislocating his elbow, though at the time we thought it was broken given the pain he was in. Despite the relative distance from civilization the ambulance arrived in under 20 minutes. The paramedics were professional and made sure dad had both an inhaled painkiller and two shots of morphine before they moved him, which they did with great care on a gurney. The ambulance ride was totally free.

In America, the ambulance was on site after my fall very fast, I was in Los Angeles so, unsurprising. They were LAFD guys and pretty cool, but they didn't give me anything for the pain, which was considerable - my left foot was twisted around into an impossible angle, and jagged ends of bone were bulging against the flesh of my leg. They opted to pick me up and carry me out by hand. While carrying me out they accidentally allowed the foot to droop causing a wave of pain beyond anything I have ever experienced. In the ambulance the first thing they did was ask for my insurance information. I didn't know but I told them that my girlfriend had the details and she was on her way. I asked, well, begged, for pain relief but was told they didn't want to do anything that would contra-indicate the ER's options. It hurt like ****, I couldn't believe this. Around this time they told me they couldn't feel a pulse in my foot, I was already freaked out and this was the last straw, I had to insist they give me oxygen to give me something to focus on, I was hyperventilating, face going numb, fingers curling up involuntarily. They did tear up the invoice though which was nice.

Hospitals:

In Australia I was hospitalized at the turn of the century for a tonsular abscess that eventually required the removal of my tonsils and a year later for acute pancreatitus. I think the quality of care of any given hospital stay is dependent on the staff you have for the visit, regardless of the health care system you're in. For example the Aussies treated me for the abscess but missed the, I'm told, obvious fact that the infected tonsil had died and needed to be removed. I eventually had it taken out in New Zealand after being really sick for a month, the doctors here in Sydney were mystified and kept giving me antibiotics, in NZ a doctor worked it out inside of a minute of looking in my throat. At any rate, I had no health insurance and all of this cost me nothing.

My mother was diagnosed and treated for leukemia for 18 months in Sydney, in a cancer unit run by one of the countries foremost researchers of the disease. The care she got was excellent, some of the injections she received were $2000 a shot. Even though they knew the type of the disease she had was terminal except in children, they worked tirelessly and relentlessly to give her even just a few more months of life. Some of her doctors and nurses even came to the funeral. She had no health insurance, this was all free. Of all the worries we had during this time, how to pay for her health care was never one of them.

In the US, every time someone moved me they forgot the foot wasn't held on except for a few veins and a bit of meat and it would flop down upon which I would see stars and howl. Fun. They strapped my leg up with my foot pointing nearly a full 90 degrees from where it's supposed to be causing a lot of unnecessary pain, when the surgeon saw this the next day he was pretty pissed off they had done that, and re-strapped it the right way.

I had my first encounter with the hospitals billing department in the ER and they kept coming in during my stay to ask for payment/insurance details, something you just do not get in a socialized medical care system. Being new to the US and seriously injured this adds an incredible amount of stress to the situation. By the next morning the nurses on my ward had stopped answering my call button but I couldn't seem to get enough visits from ladies with clipboards wanting my father's Amex number. One of those cows rang my father at 5am Sydney time and demanded he deposit $2400 right away, despite this being covered under my insurance. Dad swears she gave him the impression my treatment would 'suffer' unless he paid up. I wonder what they would have done if he said no? Probably left me by the curb in my blue gown with my *** hanging out of it. Coming just months after my mother's passing I am furious they did this to my father.

Adding to the fun the cannula in my arm got tissued somehow, meaning all the painkillers they were giving me went into the flesh of my arm and not my circulation system thus not working at all. I think most of the nurses that first night decided I was junkie or something because I kept complaining (and eventually, weeping and sobbing) that the shots weren't working so of course I had to be lying. The next morning I hadn't slept, I was in agony beyond what I felt was my physical limit, thats when I snapped and yelled at the head nurse, pretty much telling her what I thought of the US health system so far. You know how they found out the first IV line was faulty? I had to ask a nurse to give me a new one. She wasn't going to then I made her watch while she pushed saline through it and nothing happened except for the bruised skin around the insertion point swelled up. Then she puts the new one in my hand it it works perfectly. After a night and half a day essentially laying there with no pain relief and my left foot broken off. This is the same nurse who told me the windows don't open when I asked her for some air because I was sweating and about to be sick. They did open, another nurse had opened them for me a day earlier. I tried to convince her they did open, she refused to try. Fighting the rising nausea and pain I got the **** up out of bed in my cast and trailing IV lines and ******* opened the window in front of her, she just looked at me dumbly. So, so ******* stupid. Another nurse had a habit of not sterilizing the line before injecting it which is a huge medical no-no, that's how people get infections and die. The next time she tried to do that I made her swab it first. She had the swabs in her pocket, she just couldn't be bothered to use them. Wow... getting angry remembering all of this.

There were some great staff there, the surgical team were movie-level professional, or like the cast from some top rating show about smart and sexy doctors, and from the second night the night-team were run by this amazing compassionate nurse and her team. They were all very professional and caring - genuinely so - but some of the day team can suck my dick.

So there you go. One's man's experiences in both systems. I've heard horror stories from people who've been in hospitals around the world and what happened to me could have happened anywhere. The only difference is it cost just under $50,000 in the US and would have destroyed me financially had I not had insurance whereas over here, whether you get a good team of doctors or nurses or not, it doesn't cost you a ******* cent no matter if you're the head of a corporation or unemployed. The downside is, your taxes are higher to pay for the health care system, but on the other hand given the insane amount of money the US spends on defense maybe with a little budget juggling taxes wouldn't have to go up by much. Just saying.
 
The poor hospital care could happen anywhere, but that story shows how evil capitalism can be. I heard somewhere that, by law, hospitals can choose to not treat you, even if you've already been diagnosed. This is why insurance is so important, and if you don't have it, you die one way or another.

Social healthcare works damn fine. I don't care how rich this country is, there are still too many people without health insurance and (no matter how stupid and ignorant they are) they shouldn't be left to die in a stuffy hospital room with sadistic nurses.
 
The poor hospital care could happen anywhere, but that story shows how evil capitalism can be. I heard somewhere that, by law, hospitals can choose to not treat you, even if you've already been diagnosed. This is why insurance is so important, and if you don't have it, you die one way or another.

Social healthcare works damn fine. I don't care how rich this country is, there are still too many people without health insurance and (no matter how stupid and ignorant they are) they shouldn't be left to die in a stuffy hospital room with sadistic nurses.
Not true. Hospitals must treat a patient if they are 'in immediate danger of death' but not if they are diagnosed with a long-term illness like cancer. This just compounds the problem as in a good deal of cases hospitals receive absolutely no money for their work and are thus forced to hike their rates for the rest of us. Capitalism + mandatory treatment = high prices.

As for the flip side, how many countries are on universal health care? How many of those countries have experienced a complete breakdown in the medical community? There will always be a demand for physicians, and nurses, and surgeons, etc. They have job security.
 
Not true. Hospitals must treat a patient if they are 'in immediate danger of death'
Thankyou for pointing that out, I was about to explode and rant :D.

...Capitalism is not evil. Without capitalism we would not have the advancements in immunizations, specialized equipment, and other such medical advances which have saved billions of lives over the last 100 years. Most medical advancements have come from one place, the United States. Why? Capitalism. I could say more in response to a capitalism is evil claim made by someone, although doing so would require that I break my own rules on political debating.
 
This sounds kinda weak, but I didn't actually mean capitalism was evil. I said it can be evil. We all know it can, it's just obvious. In a capitalist society money = life. Sure, it makes the world go round, it keeps business alive, it benefits people, but, in the end, so does socialism. In a capitalist nation, there are poor people, there are "unlucky" people (mostly have sometihng to do with the judicial system), there are miserable people.

If a true communist nation would've ever been set up (correctly), people would be happy. No one starves, no one rules, no one is poor, no one is rich. Everyone is the same. Those who try to rise up would be put down by the people, who are fond of their lives.

Wow, I am gonna get a lot of opposition to this.
 
Yes, you are :). Communism will never ever work, period. Human nature will always prove as a downfall to any form of communist government. There will always be people who will want to take advantage, use greed, and other such methods. Take for a moment the consideration of the government. Unless you want complete anarchy, there has to be some form of government to regulate the social system. What is there to stop government representatives from taking advantage of the people? What is to stop government representatives from manipulating money distribution to put some extra cash in their pockets? Even if these were to somehow be outruled *which they can't because human nature prevents it from such* how would society be able to encourage hard work? If everyone received equal wages, why the heck would I want to go to college and earn my PhD to one day become a professor when I could do nothing and work as a gas pump attendant and receive equal wages?

Ah the joys of political science :D.
 
"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin."
~Ronald Reagan
 
Yes, you are :). Communism will never ever work, period. Human nature will always prove as a downfall to any form of communist government. There will always be people who will want to take advantage, use greed, and other such methods. Take for a moment the consideration of the government. Unless you want complete anarchy, there has to be some form of government to regulate the social system. What is there to stop government representatives from taking advantage of the people? What is to stop government representatives from manipulating money distribution to put some extra cash in their pockets? Even if these were to somehow be outruled *which they can't because human nature prevents it from such* how would society be able to encourage hard work? If everyone received equal wages, why the heck would I want to go to college and earn my PhD to one day become a professor when I could do nothing and work as a gas pump attendant and receive equal wages?

Ah the joys of political science :D.
The people rule themselves. Once the government is set up, it is simply maintained without any change at all by the people. And no one in a communistic society would allow others to take advantage, not that in a society like that anyone would even consider doing it. And in communism people are basically assigned to their jobs by the demand. If it's put together it's almost perfect.

Animaldude, Marx was a genius.

So, I know this was little heard because of more important events (a.k.a. Heath Ledger's death), but did anyone happen to hear any news of Fidel Castro resigning after 5 decades of the United States shitting its pants for this?
 
Animaldude, Marx was a genius.
Oh yeah sure.

The people rule themselves. Once the government is set up, it is simply maintained without any change at all by the people. And no one in a communistic society would allow others to take advantage, not that in a society like that anyone would even consider doing it. And in communism people are basically assigned to their jobs by the demand. If it's put together it's almost perfect.
I don't really think you addressed the issue there. You don't understand that human nature doesn't allow for a communist society to take place. Look at history. Why have people fled communist countries? Remember the Berlin Wall? That wasn't to keep people out, it was to keep people in. There is no motivation. No feeling of success. In a communist society no one is happy. Oh, and how does society progress? You need to realize that an inventor won't work long hours non-stop trying to create the next big thing in technology when he can get just as much working as a garbage man.
 
I understand the logic that some people have when they say that communism cannot work, but I can't help wondering this: If communism cannot truly work, then what was the whole point to the Cold War?

Yeah Fidel's steppin down, but his brother Raul will prolly still be in power. Fidel actually has been out of power unofficially since the summer of 2006 when his health began to fail him, and Raul Castro has done the day to day work.
 
Oh yeah sure.


I don't really think you addressed the issue there. You don't understand that human nature doesn't allow for a communist society to take place. Look at history. Why have people fled communist countries? Remember the Berlin Wall? That wasn't to keep people out, it was to keep people in. There is no motivation. No feeling of success. In a communist society no one is happy. Oh, and how does society progress? You need to realize that an inventor won't work long hours non-stop trying to create the next big thing in technology when he can get just as much working as a garbage man.
Wow, Marx alone created an almost perfect form of government. Let's see you do that.

Communism won't work if people see their alternatives, and that leads to why society isn't supposed to progress. If the entire world is communist people will be happy having no alternatives. People can't deal with their options, history has shown us that, so if you give them this one thing which will satisfy everyone (because everyone is equal) they won't need options, and they won't need another government. If that government makes the people happy, why would they want to progress?

The only reason communism can't work is because people have a choice at the moment.

And Karl Marx was ******* brilliant.
 
I understand the logic that some people have when they say that communism cannot work, but I can't help wondering this: If communism cannot truly work, then what was the whole point to the Cold War?
So that all of society doesn't become communist and that all the progress of mankind doesnt go to waste.
Communism won't work if people see their alternatives, and that leads to why society isn't supposed to progress. If the entire world is communist people will be happy having no alternatives. People can't deal with their options, history has shown us that, so if you give them this one thing which will satisfy everyone (because everyone is equal) they won't need options, and they won't need another government. If that government makes the people happy, why would they want to progress?

The only reason communism can't work is because people have a choice at the moment.
Wow. Are you listening to yourself? Are you suggesting that all of society just freeze? That would be great. Now let's say some planet is on track to run into us 100 years from now. If we had the science to stop that from happening, that's be a nice thing. In communism we wouldn't progress far enough to do that.
 
So that all of society doesn't become communist and that all the progress of mankind doesnt go to waste.

Wow. Are you listening to yourself? Are you suggesting that all of society just freeze? That would be great. Now let's say some planet is on track to run into us 100 years from now. If we had the science to stop that from happening, that's be a nice thing. In communism we wouldn't progress far enough to do that.
If a planets gonna run into us 100 years from now we won't be able to stop it anyway.

How do you propose to stop a giant ball of dirt, magma, and other matter that's probably bigger than the rock you live on now?

Society would benefit from a standstill. People would be happy without all kinds of change coming into their lives.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top